Job Fail

As mentioned, I have spent the last few days on vacation. While there I got to do something I rarely do these days which is to read a fiction book from cover to cover in a few days. For this selection I chose a Tom Robbins book I haven’t read – it wasn’t recommended, I just got it at some sale a while back – the book is Half Asleep in Frog Pajamas.

It was amusing enough to hold my interest, I can’t really recommend it for great reading but there were several parts that really did intrigue me – especially because the copyright is eighteen years old and several of the ideas seem extremely contemporary (like the instability of the stock market system and how it’s being gamed by insiders).  I’d like to cite a passage here describing the lecture of the antagonist – a former stock broker star:

… in our society, jobs are an aberration, a flash in the pan…People have always worked, he explains, but they have only held jobs – with wages and employees and vacations and pink slips – for a very short time. And now, with the proliferation of cybernetics and robotics and automation of all types and degrees, jobs are on the way out again. In the context of history, jobs have been but a passing fancy.

Nowadays, he would have you believe, the state uses jobs, or rather the illusion of jobs as a mechanism for control. When there is a public outcry about some particularly vile instance of deforestation, wreckage, or pollution, the “pufftoads” hasten to justify the environmental assault by trumpeting the jobs it allegedly will save or create – and then the protests fade like the rustle of a worn dollar bill. Foreign policy decisions, including illegal and immoral acts of armed intervention, likewise are made acceptable, even popular, on the grounds that such actions are necessary to protect American jobs. Virtually every candidate for public office in the past seventy years has campaigned with the rubber worm of “more jobs” dangling from his or her rusty hook, and the angler with the most lifelike worm snags the votes, even though all voters except the cerebrally paralyzed must recognize that there are going to be fewer and fewer jobs as time – and technology – progresses.

I kept checking the date on this book. This is fiction from 1994.

Jobs are the magical trump card that politicians reach for time and again. Jobs are why we can’t say goodbye to destructive industry, jobs are why we rally at the advent of every new product – no matter the quality or usefulness. Jobs are why we can’t focus on health, safety, or the environment. Jobs are why our military has any civilian support; our military has become a bastion of the job based economy. Without the relatively superior pay and benefits, our all volunteer military would certainly dwindle to a fraction of its size. The military knows that a dependable, high quality work force is impossible without basic benefits of insurance, health, home security, education, retirement plans, and clear working contracts. For all that the military has not gotten right, the one thing it does get right is providing the basics for their employees and their families.

What “job” means in America is a package deal of temporary security – that could possibly lead to longer term security (but the likelihood of that constantly wanes). If someone has a “job” they have a position of usefulness secured for pay, as well as some other securities like the promise of more regular work, a semblance of safe conditions, reasonable shift lengths, healthcare options, retirement plans, building a knowledge or credibility base, as well as a social network of those in similar situations as yourself.  What has happened is that the previously agreed upon social contract of security and longevity is now void. With a global economy, American workers now compete with companies that have built their policy on not providing workers with safe and secure conditions for the short or long term. Our system of distribution and an assembly line that wraps around the globe means that tracing inhumane treatment is a lost cause for the average consumer. The likelihood that some of the workers that processed our food, clothing, shelter, retail goods, and even medical goods were mistreated or forced to work in substandard situations is extremely high. The American workforce has simply joined the legion of mistreated and exploited international workers in a globalized economy.

If we want a permanent solution to our own short term and long term security, our country must establish a minimum standard of living – kind of like the military did for an entry level recruit with a family. If someone goes through life trying, working, contributing to society, they should be able to afford a minimum standard of living – one that allows for dignity in our food, shelter, health, liberties, and pursuits of happiness. We know how to do it – the military is a part of our government – we just have to find the voice to claim that being American means having dignity and compassion, it means that we care about “strangers” because we have humane American standards.

Tagged , , , , , ,

4 thoughts on “Job Fail

  1. lokywoky says:

    Unfortunately, the pay and benefits that the military receive are already under attack by the right as being too generous. This even though the lowest ranks of enlisted often qualify for food stamps. Yes you heard that correctly.

    Schools next to military bases used to receive subsidies from the federal government since they usually don’t get much funding from a tax base (federal lands are exempt from state property taxes natch) and these schools are almost 100% filled with military kids. Bush/Cheney moved to defund this saying that “they had other priorities”.

    Increases in pay for the enlisted ranks were always either cut completely or slashed to half or less by Republicans because we “can’t afford it” while they continued to fund the F-35 fighter which even Rumsfeld and Gates both didn’t want.

    Medical care in the military – while automatic, comes with its own horror stories. It can range from so exemplerary it makes you want to cry – to so horrific it makes you ant to go out and find the someone responsible and kill them over it.

    You get the pension after serving for 30 years. But if you get wounded in combat, you are discharged. No 30 years. No pension. Thanks a lot. Good luck fighting with the VA for your benefits after that.

    And the military has a “glass ceiling” that is in place due to an act of Congress. Advancement in rank at the top echelons in all the services requires combat/command experience. With a prohibition in place forbidding women in combat – that means women have no chance at all of ever advancing to flag ranks. Talk about institutionalized discrimination.

    So holding our military up as a model to follow for pay and benefits is not really a good thing to do. It is a job of last resort for poor and disadvantaged people. There is no other job in the country where the “job” is to go kill people and risk getting killed yourself. Ugh.

    And yes, I am a veteran.

  2. Amy Meier says:

    Thanks for your insight and info. I know that newly enlisted and their families still struggle, but it is at least recognized there that those working are humans that need food, shelter, and health care.

    I also agree about the last statement. On Memorial Day, it is hard to talk about the indignities of serving when you are not a veteran.

  3. Mark Henry Bloom says:

    I also read Half Asleep in Frog’s Pajamas recently without knowing much about it beforehand. I felt the same way about as you did: What year was it published? But then I realized something. The system hasn’t changed since Reagan’s merger-crazy reign that opened up banking and insurance companies to co-mingle.

    People don’t change much either. If you think (or worse, know) that you can get away with murder, well, it at least crosses your mind and you weigh your alternatives. The system is geared to reward such behavior, both in the financial markets and in the legal system. Since people won’t change, the idea is to change the incentives.

    If you want to discourage murder, you not only make it illegal (duh), but you prosecute to the full extent of the law and make the punishment severe enough to discourage that behavior. If you want banks that don’t gamble with its depositors’ funds, you make it worth their while not to. You don’t bail them out with no strings attached when they misbehave. That only encourages them to do it again.

    I think that’s where we need to go, but unfortunately, Congress — the vehicle we would normally use to make those changes — are in the hands of the moneyed interests. So how to proceed? Publicly funded elections are one alternative. I have others, too, if you care to hear them.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: